Categories
Products and Design The Next Computer Wellness when Always-On

Healthy habit formation through tiny first steps

This blog post about building habits by breaking actions down to two-minute first steps:

Whenever you find it hard to get started on a task, consider scaling it down into a 2-minute version. For example… Read a book → Read one page, Write an essay → Write one sentence… Do 100 push-ups → Do 1 push up, Eat more vegetables → Eat an apple

I agree. I’m drawn to apps and software that make it easy to take first iny first steps. Apple’s iOS Books app is one such. In fact, we have written about this before:

You can set a daily reading goal – I’ve set it to twenty minutes, even though I will get a little more done every day. The app then tracks this as you read over the day, and sends you a notification when you’re hit it… The app then logs streaks for the number of days that you’ve hit this goal. You can see this in the large screenshot at the top. For me, streaks are highly motivating.

This is the screenshot I was referring to. You can see progress towards a daily goal as well as the streak right below it.

If you want to build up a reading habit, this can be very helpful. You can set your daily reading goal to as low as you like – even the two minutes that the blog post talks about.

You can set a phone reminder that goes off in the morning, or when you’re winding down, to get your two minutes of reading done.

The Fitbit’s gentle nudge to walk at least 250 steps every hour is another example. Fitbit calls this Reminders to Move. 250 steps isn’t much, but if you do it during the course of a 8 hour workday it adds up to 2000 steps. And keeps you from sitting idle for extended periods of time.

I wish more apps were designed with healthy habit formation in mind as opposed to being heavily optimized for constant, mindless usage.


(Featured image photo credit: Freestocks/Unsplash)

Categories
Decentralisation and Neutrality Discovery and Curation Making Money Online

How pay-to-play news websites gain legitimacy

This article talks about the phenomenon of paid right-wing news:

Clients pay for certain “news” to be produced—and then it is, published on a normal-looking local news site, alongside countless innocuous stories produced by machines as camouflage.

But what’s more important is why these sites gain a veneer of legitimacy. They

 [take] advantage of how profit-chasing has blown up the entire concept of “media literacy.” When your local paper’s website is as larded up with spammy-looking ad crud as an illegal Monday Night Football stream, these spare sites cannot possibly look any less “real.” And as newspapers die and people get more and more of their news from social media, fewer people recognize which news “brands” are supposed to be “trustworthy.”

The alternative to running ad-heavy websites is to charge for access. While many well-known publications have done so – NYT, WSJ, Bloomberg, FT, even WIRED – the paywall does mean fewer people end up reading articles on these sites. This puts them at a disadvantage to these pseudo-news websites, which rely neither exclusively on advertisements or paywall, but on their patrons whose views they publish as news. This breaking of the business-editorial wall is not luxury a serious publication can afford.

This comment on a Reddit thread says exactly this:

Wapo, New York times, NY Daily news, business insider, wired on and on and on, all these places used to be free and now I’m left with the freaking horrible terrible NY post.

See also: Our series on 21st Century Media, what it will look like, and its challenges


(Featured image photo credit: Md. Mahdi/Unsplash)