Categories
Uncategorized

Helped a friend breathe life into a 2014 Mac Mini by replacing the spinning-disk hard drive with an SSD. Here it is installing Mac OS on that SSD:

I know my way around the insides of early 2010s Apple laptops: the unibody MacBook Pros (see my post about expanding the RAM and fitting an SSD), the retina MacBook Pros, and the classic pre-retina MacBook Airs. The 2014 Mac Mini was a new experience: components are layered, unlike a MacBook.

I wish modern machines, Macs and otherwise, were more user-serviceable and upgradeable. This same friend has a 2017 MacBook Pro with soldered-on RAM and storage, which can’t be upgraded at all.

As someone who, as a teen, assembled his first PC in the late 1990s and upgraded it steadily for over ten years, the iPadification of computer hardware isn’t welcome – although I do see the benefit of increased security.

Categories
Uncategorized

“It’s somewhat baffling to me how some people focus so much on the technology aspects of something to the point of forgetting that its success is due to the things that it does not do.”

comment on Hacker News

That reminded me of Zawinski’s Law of Software Envelopment:

Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.

Jamie Zawinski
Categories
Uncategorized

On mobile & laptop I wish I could add WhatsApp/Telegram msgs, emails or tweets to a ‘reply-later’ queue. For all the times when I’ve read it, but maybe right now I’m outside, or I want to think & reply, or I want to batch-reply.

Mark-as-unread per app doesn’t cut it. On so many levels.

So much innovation in mobile interfaces yet to come.

Categories
Uncategorized

While there are several clones of the popular, simple word-guessing game Wordle, the original retains cachet as the Wordle.

I wonder how much of it flows from its originality (like a piece of art – innumerable copies/derivatives but the original is what is in museums).

And how much of it is the very particular design choice to limit it to one puzzle a day, so that everyone around the world is solving the same Wordle. A strong social facet of a game that has no intrinsic social game-play at all:

Categories
Uncategorized

The Tragedy of the No-Op

An old observation of mine has been that the more powerful and plentiful our devices get, the longer they spend idle. I call it the Tragedy of the No-Op.

(A No-Op or NOP is a machine language instruction that tells the processor to do nothing, an empty cycle).

The processor on a Nokia ‘dumbphone’ spent a greater percentage of its lifetime cycles working for its owner than today’s iPhone. Or iPads, Macs, Echos, routers, smart home switches, TVs, or connected cars.

We own more computers today than ever. And each of those gets more powerful each year – and they stay idle more and more. An Echo mostly just stands there checking “did someone say Alexa?” over and over for well over 99% of its life.

I’m pro-abundance – to coin a term – so I’, reluctant to call this idle computing power a waste. But I do wonder if we can put all this silicon to better use.

For example: Bitcoin mining is now increasingly concentrated among a small set of mining pools because bitcoin now requires miners to run specialised hardware, ASICs, to be competitive earning mining rewards. Ethereum also requires high end graphics-processing-units or GPUs. The demand for GPUs got to the point where in May last year Nvidia designed a graphics card that would cripple its own performance if it detected its use for crypto mining.

It’s the same for storage: most of us have inexpensive hard drives and pen derives, and hundreds of GBs of free space on our laptops and iPads and phones, and yet decentralised storage projects require massive amounts of high-end solid state drives connected to powerful computers to be viable.

So here we all are, with more combined computing resources than ever across all our devices but today’s proof of work/space blockchains are such that they require even *more* hardware, affordable by a very few – far from their ideal of decentralising trust and opportunity and value creation.

What will new blockchains that can run on billions of devices look like? What new use cases will they make possible? What effect will they have on wealth creation? What incentives will they create for low-cost devices and even cheaper, ubiquitous connectivity?

Like with every seemingly intractable problem, this is a massive opportunity. I wonder what tomorrow’s solutions to these will look like.

Categories
Uncategorized

Intimacy doesn’t scale

I think a significant part of the problems with today’s social media design is the lack of context, whether it is photos on Instagram or posts on Facebook.

You scroll through a feed. You tap on a post. You read the caption. That’s all you have to divine the poster’s background, intent, state of mind, everything.

So the engagement between the poster and their readers/viewers is shallow. It’s expressed in one-tap likes or thumbs-ups. It’s expressed in one-tap re-tweets. It’s expressed in single-line comments that might as well have been emojis. LinkedIn even suggests emotive canned reactions, complete with exclamation marks (“That’s great!” and “Has it been a year already!”).

Very quickly the poster begins sharing with the expectation of mass visibility but low-engagement. Readers scroll past even faster, ignoring dozens of posts wholesale, and tap-tap-ing their reactions on a few. Tapping and expanding to read a message and is attached photos is breaking rhythm (leave alone reading a message’s other comments or tapping an attached link).

Once this becomes the norm, the whole act of expressing oneself on social media takes on a hollow, performative look. Our real selves move to other places like our messaging inboxes & small family groups – the dark forests of the Internet.

This extract from a blog post I stumbled upon says it well:

… thinking about photo sharing in general. And more specifically about how we’ve created this efficient system for sharing to a mass audience. The personal aspect of photos is lost in the sharing process.

When I would post a photo, I wouldn’t receive any comments, it never sparked any conversations. I would just get a handful of likes and that was that. What’s the point? It’s become a game of vanity where the number of likes you receive is the only feedback mechanism. It stinks.

As an experiment, I started sharing photos with individual people, privately, over iMessage. I wouldn’t send them a whole collection of photos, just one at a time here and there. And what I found is that when you send an individual person a photo privately, you actually spark a conversation.

https://initialcharge.net/2022/01/thoughts-on-photo-sharing/

The design of social media simply doesn’t lend itself well to the sort of engagement that the writer sought. From its earliest days, social media has sought to optimise for scale. At the beginning it made sense because the more people there were on a service the more, well, social it’d be.

But these services also began optimising for increased engagement between users. Increasing followers and followed. Encouraging frequent posting. Encouraging limitless scrolling. If you expend much of your cognitive bandwidth on breadth of coverage, precious little is left for depth of interaction.

Group chats have proved to be a reasonable alternative to social media. I wonder what that will evolve to.