<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rahul gaitonde dot org &#187; Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/category/analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>About Yahoo!&#039;s home page redesign this week</title>
		<link>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2009/07/about-yahoos-home-page-redesign-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2009/07/about-yahoos-home-page-redesign-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rahulgaitonde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! just redesigned the Yahoo.com home page, its crown jewel for a decade. The big change is a bar on the left with widgets that display updates from Facebook, Gmail, New York Times and some 60 other sources. The company &#8230; <a href="http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2009/07/about-yahoos-home-page-redesign-this-week/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! just redesigned the <a href="http://m.in.yahoo.com/">Yahoo.com home page</a>, its crown jewel for a decade. The big change is a bar on the left with widgets that display updates from Facebook, Gmail, New York Times and some 60 other sources. The company made a big deal of it, but on the whole it&#8217;s failed to impress.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t regurgitate the bucketfuls of painstakingly-written criticism of the redesign itself that I&#8217;ve read over the past few days. In any case it&#8217;s too early to measure the impact of this change. I think the problem with the lukewarm, even negative reviews was with how Yahoo! announced the change to the world. <strong>In other words, this was a communications, not an execution problem.</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://ycorpblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/beforeafter.jpg" alt="The new Yahoo! home page" border="0" /></p>
<p><strong>Why everyone said &#8220;Ho-Hum&#8221;</strong><br />
The verdict is that this is old hat, and too little to make a difference &#8211; and there&#8217;s reason to be skeptical. The web has seen at least two major paradigm shifts since the late 1990s (first search and then social media), but Yahoo! has persisted with the original portal paradigm &#8211; making money off visitors to its home page by keeping them on its properties. But Yahoo! now <a href="http://comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/7/comScore_Media_Metrix_Ranks_Top_50_U.S._Web_Properties_for_June_2009">ranks 2nd behind Google</a> as the most visited property on the web &#8211; and Google makes money by sending people <em>away</em> from its search page!</p>
<p>Yahoo! is under tremendous pressure to 1. innovate and 2. stay relevant in the future. Any move by the company needs to score very well on these two parameters. Redesigning a home page, however dramatically, is not such a move.</p>
<p><strong>Let your users say how great it is</strong><br />
Any pragmatist at Yahoo! would have anticipated that news of a home page redesign would not be seen as game-changing by itself &#8211; either by Yahoo&#8217;s users or by its advertisers [1].</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why it probably made more sense to simply <strong>spread awareness of the impending redesign than to generate buzz and create hype</strong>. CEO Carol Bartz <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/168825/yahoo_most_significant_change_fails_to_wow.html">called it</a> &#8220;most significant change in our home page since the company&#8217;s inception&#8221;. So what? While the redesign effort was probably significant internally (money, time, CEO attention), it&#8217;s presumptious to assume users will find it just as significant. Bring out the tom-tom drums <em>after</em> your users have given you the thumbs-up.</p>
<p>As for advertisers, Yahoo! would probably have been far better off sharing metrics with them on a one-on-one basis <em>after</em> the launch. Display new targeting capabilities. Show user adoption rates. Show clickthrough statistics. Things that will bring a grin to advertisers&#8217; faces, especially when they&#8217;re under pressure to get the most bang for buck with dramatically reduced budgets. Of course, all this is only if the redesign really works.</p>
<p>In other words, it&#8217;s time for Yahoo!, in an infinitely more transparent world, to put its money where its mouth is.</p>
<p>[1] No kidding. Tapan Bhat, Sr. Vice President at Yahoo, crowned himself Supreme Emperor of Unintentional Irony by <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/20/yahoo-is-revamping-its-home-page/">declaring</a> that the new home page would put Yahoo! at the “center point of people’s lives online.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2009/07/about-yahoos-home-page-redesign-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What makes Xobni so popular?</title>
		<link>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2008/06/what-makes-xobni-so-popular/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2008/06/what-makes-xobni-so-popular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rahulgaitonde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xobni]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Xobni is an Outlook plugin that has proven remarkably useful in managing managing bloated inboxes. It&#8217;s generated its fair share of buzz lately, and most users seem to love it. Apart from a clutch of very well-implemented features, what it &#8230; <a href="http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2008/06/what-makes-xobni-so-popular/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Xobni: Email organization, search, and navigation for your Outlook inbox" href="http://www.xobni.com">Xobni</a> is an Outlook plugin that has proven remarkably useful in managing managing bloated inboxes. It&#8217;s generated its fair share of buzz lately, and most users seem to love it. Apart from a clutch of <a title="ArsTechnica's review of Xobni" href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080506-hhands-on-with-xobni-make-outlook-more-productive-social.html">very well-implemented features</a>, what it is about Xobni that make it such a <em>inherently</em> popular tool?</p>
<p><img class="alignright" style="float:right;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3074/2594252415_f57955d70b_m.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="240" /><strong>Visibility:</strong> Xobni is a sidebar for Microsoft Outlook 2003 and 2007. With tens of millions of people using Outlook at work and, indeed, spending all day in it, Xobni is constantly in its users&#8217; view. Contrast that with applications like Facebook, which live in a tab in your browser and will be out of view most of the time. (Serendipitiously, widescreen monitors are more popular than ever before, so a sidebar works well).</p>
<p><strong>Ready-to-go:</strong> Unlike Facebook, xobni doesn&#8217;t need a first-time user to enter profile information, build a network over time by inviting friends, or accumulating wall posts or scraps. Xobni uses as fodder the tons and tons of information that&#8217;s already accumulated over the years in your inbox. That means once it&#8217;s done indexing, Xobni gets you up and running right away &#8211; discovering your network instead of you building it.</p>
<p><strong>Intent-based:</strong> Xobni understands how you &#8216;do&#8217; email. Users don&#8217;t view email as a chronological list of tasks at all &#8211; they either want to look at email as boxes of tasks (or projects or events), or as a collection of people whom they talk with. Xobni does the latter, and very well. So it&#8217;s a cinch looking up attachments from a contact, or the time of day you typically communicate with someone, or schedule time with someone.</p>
<p><strong>Cool: </strong>Xobni&#8217;s done a terrific job of being viewed as something cool to transform drab old Outlook into. That&#8217;s why so many early adopters have turned passionate evangelists.</p>
<p>Do you use Outlook at work? Have you given Xobni a spin? What else (apart from specific features) do you think makes Xobni popular?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2008/06/what-makes-xobni-so-popular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you solve the problem of&#8230; metrics?</title>
		<link>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2007/03/how-do-you-solve-the-problem-of-metrics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2007/03/how-do-you-solve-the-problem-of-metrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rahulgaitonde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2007/03/27/how-do-you-solve-the-problem-of-metrics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Daboll, &#8220;Chief of Insights&#8221; (wow!) at Yahoo!, contends that page views as a measure of website performance are outdated. Daboll&#8217;s argument is that with Ajax, Flash and embedded video, traditional methods are no longer accurate indicators. While he&#8217;s right &#8230; <a href="http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2007/03/how-do-you-solve-the-problem-of-metrics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Daboll, &#8220;Chief of Insights&#8221; (wow!) at Yahoo!, <a href="http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/19/time-for-a-new-hit/">contends that page views as a measure of website performance are outdated</a>. Daboll&#8217;s argument is that with Ajax, Flash and embedded video, traditional methods are no longer accurate indicators. While he&#8217;s right on that count, his call for &#8220;visits a day&#8221; as an alternative measure doesn&#8217;t quite measure up. <a href="http://yodel.yahoo.com/2007/03/07/thanks-for-visiting-we-like-you-too/">Consider this</a>:</p>
<div style="text-align:justify;">
<p><i>As you sip your morning coffee, you scan the headlines of the day, you write a couple emails on Yahoo! Mail, and then do a quick read on your stocks at Yahoo! Finance. 1 visit. After three back-to-back meetings, you remember that your significant other’s birthday is coming up, so you check out the Yahoo! Travel reviews for user recommendations on the most romantic hotel and book your last minute getaway. 2 visits. When you come back from lunch, you check to see if your friend has responded to your email about next week’s party. 3 visits. As you pack up to leave, you go to Yahoo! Local to look up that new sushi bar two cities away, and click Yahoo! Maps for directions to the restaurant. 4 visits.</i></p>
<p>Remember up-front that you (as Yahoo!) are measuring web &#8220;effectiveness&#8221; to maximise advertising revenue (banner-based or Adwords/Overture based). From that perspective, here&#8217;s why Daboll&#8217;s model is flawed. First, it isn&#8217;t applicable to anything other than diverse portals like Yahoo!, which aspire to be &#8220;one-stop shops&#8221; (I&#8217;m hearing that too often now &#8211; indications of a return to portal-ism?). Second, it doesn&#8217;t consider the many many different user interfaces to online information today that aren&#8217;t browser-based or even web-page-based. What about Yahoo&#8217;s own much-vaunted <a href="http://widgets.yahoo.com/">Widgets</a>? What about the content access through Yahoo! Messenger? Through <a href="http://desktop.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! Desktop Search</a>? Through <a href="http://toolbar.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! Toolbar</a>? Third, what about always-on customisable home pages such as the one Google offers? A user could access content all day long and never have to make more than one &#8220;visit&#8221;. Similarly, a Gmail inbox could be open all day too, with several dozen ads being served. That would count as one &#8220;visit&#8221; too.</p>
<p>Daboll&#8217;s got the right idea (we do need different metrics to measure effectiveness), but &#8220;visits&#8221; is simplifying it too much.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rahulgaitonde.org/2007/03/how-do-you-solve-the-problem-of-metrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

